home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, APRIL 5, 1993
-
-
-
- APPEAL -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 92-1249 AFRICAN AM. VOTING, ET. AL. V. BLUNT, ROY, ET AL.
-
- The judgment is affirmed.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 91-1800 HARLOW FAY, INC. V. FED. LAND BANK OF ST. LOUIS
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Pioneer Investment
-
- Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited
-
- Partnership, 507 U. S. (1993).
-
- 91-1855 PEARSON, ALVIN, ET AL. V. EDGAR, GOV. OF ILLINOIS
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of City of Cincinnati
-
- v. Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U. S. (1993).
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- A-734 RESERVE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY V. RAY CROWELL, ET UX.
-
- The application for stay presented to Justice
-
- Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is granted and it
-
- is ordered that execution upon the punitive damages portion
-
- of the judgment entered February 5, 1993 by the Supreme
-
- Court of Alabama, case Nos. 1911098, 1911099 and 1911157,
-
- is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition by this
-
- Court of a petition for a writ of certiorari. If the
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied, this order is
-
- to terminate automatically. Should the petition for a writ
-
- of certiorari be granted, this order is to remain in
-
- effect pending the issuance of the mandate of this Court.
-
- D-1252 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MELVIN M. LEBETKIN
-
- It is ordered that Melvin M. Lebetkin, of Kew
-
- Gardens, New York, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1253 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD PRESTON PERRIN
-
- It is ordered that Richard Preston Perrin, of
-
- Washington, D.C., be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1254 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD J. BODNER
-
- It is ordered that Howard J. Bodner, of Rockville
-
- Centre, New York, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1255 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LARRY G. RIGHTMYER
-
- It is ordered that Larry G. Rightmyer, of St.
-
- Petersburg, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- 119, ORIG. CONNECTICUT, ET AL. V. NEW HAMPSHIRE
-
- The motion of Massachusetts for divided argument
-
- and for additional time for oral argument is denied.
-
- The motion of intervenors United Illuminating Company,
-
- et al. for divided argument is granted to be divided
-
- as follows: 20 minutes for the plaintiffs and 10 minutes
-
- for the intervenors. Justice Souter took no part in the
-
- consideration or decision of these motions.
-
- 92-515 WISCONSIN V. MITCHELL, TODD
-
- The motion of respondent for divided argument is
-
- denied.
-
- 92-602 ST. MARY'S HONOR, ET AL. V. HICKS, MELVIN
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amicus
-
- curiae and for divided argument is granted.
-
- 92-6033 McNEIL, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General to
-
- permit William K. Kelley, Esquire, to present oral
-
- argument pro hac vice are granted.
-
- 92-7894 RESTREPO, CARLOS E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until April 26, 1993, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
- 92-7912 IN RE MICHAEL MILLER
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until April 26, 1993, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court.
-
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-956 GERDING, CHRISTOPHER, ET AL. V. REPUBLIC OF FRANCE, ET AL.
-
- 92-320 ARGENTINA, ET AL. V. SIDERMAN DE BLAKE, ET AL.
-
- 92-964 ) COLLINS, ROBERT F. V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 92-6813 ) ROSS, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1055 SHOCKEY, WILLIAM V. PORTLAND, ET AL.
-
- 92-1084 GORDON, BRUCE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1095 LONETREE, CLAYTON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1127 HELTON, JOHN, ET AL. V. FDIC
-
- 92-1177 MYERS, CARL HAROLD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1179 KAHN, JEROME V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1186 WATERS, JOHN, ET UX. V. CIR
-
- 92-1261 ANTOINE, GARY, ET AL. V. CA COASTAL COMMN.
-
- 92-1262 BURRELL, MELBA V. TRUSTEES OF GA MILITARY
-
- 92-1266 LEIZERMAN, E. J. V. TOLEDO BAR ASSN.
-
- 92-1278 MORALES, ATTY. GEN. OF TX V. TX CATASTROPHE, ET AL.
-
- 92-1279 BERGER, JOEL V. BOARD OF REGENTS, NY, ET AL.
-
- 92-1310 BAGHDADY, ELIE V. SADLER, LARRY, ET AL.
-
- 92-1343 JOHNSON, CLIFFORD V. WHITE, CLINTON, ET AL.
-
- 92-1344 LOWERY, JOHN V. SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS
-
- 92-1353 LEWIS, DARRYL V. SOUTH CAROLINA FREIGHT
-
- 92-1355 FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH, ET AL V. WILLIAMS, ROGER, ET AL.
-
- 92-1369 ALBERICI, JOSEPH, ET UX. V. SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. CO.
-
- 92-1374 MILLER, MARK V. REDEV. AUTH. WASHINGTON CTY.
-
- 92-1387 McNUTT, NANCY V. GTE FL, INC.
-
- 92-1409 GACKENBACH, MYRON V. UNIROYAL, INC.
-
- 92-1416 CRAWFORD, HAL SPEARMAN V. LANDMARKS GROUP, ETC.
-
- 92-1429 McGAUGHEY, GUY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1460 COFFIN, DEXTER, ET AL. V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 92-5444 HARRISON, CHARLES V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-5570 KENNEDY, JANET, ET VIR V. OHIO
-
- 92-5956 ADAMS, DAVID L. V. PETERSON, SUPT., OR SCI
-
- 92-6768 WESTMORELAND, JACKIE LYNN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6784 PATTEN, ROBERT V. FLORIDA
-
- 92-6851 WALKINGEAGLE, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6886 OSPINA-BORJA, LUZ DARY V. INS
-
- 92-7012 LAMBERT, GARY DEAN V. MS DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
-
- 92-7067 GREEN, NORMAN E. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-7218 SMITH, TYRONE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7315 LATTIMORE, ROBERT NORMAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7334 McQUEEN, HAROLD V. KENTUCKY
-
- 92-7483 ARNOLD, KEITHIAN L. V. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION
-
- 92-7540 DENTON, MARK QUINN V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 92-7541 BROWN, AMOS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7542 CORNELL, ROBERT ALLAN V. NIX, WARDEN
-
- 92-7543 SMITH, LYNNARD ARVANT V. STAINER, WARDEN
-
- 92-7544 BREVELL, ALVIN PAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7547 WILSON, WILLIAM ALBERT V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-7556 HARRIS, GEORGE V. IEYOUB, ATTY. GEN. OF LA
-
- 92-7563 HEIMBAUGH, ROBERT A. V. SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.
-
- 92-7565 CATALFO, VINCENT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7574 BRIGHT, DAVID V. SMITH, SEWALL, ET AL.
-
- 92-7587 RODOLICO, LOUIS A. V. RAUCH, VENTURI, ET AL.
-
- 92-7591 MORRISON, REGINALD V. LYNN, SEC., LA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 92-7594 MUHAMMAD, SHAIKH V. DOMOVICH, SUPT., PA CORR.
-
- 92-7597 SPEARMAN, JOSE LORENZO V. EPPS, BRYANT, ET AL.
-
- 92-7598 HARRISON, MICHAEL D. V. PADILLA, RICK, ET AL.
-
- 92-7599 GOODWIN, KENNETH D. V. WELLS, WARDEN
-
- 92-7600 BRYANT, CALLIE, ET AL. V. WHALEN, LELAND, ET AL.
-
- 92-7606 JEWELL, GREGORY V. HIGGINS, JOHN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7608 JAAKKOLA, JOHN V. SHALALA, SEC. H&HS, ET AL.
-
- 92-7612 HARTER, EDWARD C. V. LOVE, SUPT.
-
- 92-7614 GREEN, MARLENE Y. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7615 GREEN, MARLENE Y. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7622 EXLER, ANDREW V. SIZZLER FAMILY STEAKHOUSES
-
- 92-7651 LYONS, HAROLD TRAVIS V. HATCHER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7675 BELL, LARRY GENE V. SOUTH CAROLINA
-
- 92-7681 MARTINEZ, RAY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7699 DELAY, DALLAS RAY V. GROOSE, SUPT.,JEFFERSON CITY
-
- 92-7728 FISHER, RANDY V. MAASS, SUPT.
-
- 92-7731 FOSTER, GARY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7733 REYES, TONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7740 WILLIAMS, WILLIE LEE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-7744 BROWN,JAMES FRANCIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7747 IVY, FRANK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7748 HELZER, RICHARD L. V. MICHIGAN
-
- 92-7754 MEADOWS, JOHNNIE V. MORRIS, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7755 MAYS, ROBERT E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7786 HARRIS, LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7790 CARTER, HARRY N. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7796 MACKEY, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7820 MILLER, LAMONT J., ET AL. V. TOOMBS, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7825 MAYSER-PEREIRA, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7832 CASARES, RICARDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7833 BARTON, MICHAEL STEVEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7836 MARTINEZ-DE LEON, DOMINGO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7837 PANDEY, VIJAI B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7840 RUMPH, LAMONT WINSLOW V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7841 REVEL, GORDON PARKER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7845 STEIN, RODNEY SID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7846 MAYS, DEDRICK DANUAL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7849 PALMER, EDDIE JAMES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7850 ROSE, WILLIAM HAINES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7853 MEDLEY, MARK GREGORY V. MARYLAND
-
- 92-7857 WOODMAN, NEIL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7860 FIORE, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7863 KUEHL, KEITH D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7866 RESENDE, NELSON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7867 MARTINEZ, ELOY ERNESTO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7869 DENSON, ROLAND V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7870 DAVILA, ARNOLD ADAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7874 GIRALDO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7878 GOLDMAN, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7881 DOMINGUEZ-VALTIERRA, ISIDRO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7889 MONTES, ROLANDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7891 MOORE, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7892 LAFRADEZ, LANDY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7982 KAIRYS, LIUDAS V. INS
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 92-1083 PHELPS, ZIBA V. SOVRAN BANK
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
-
-
- 92-1104 MARYLAND V. WATTERS, RONALD
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-1372 ELLERBEE, DEXTER V. MILLS, DEXTER
-
- The motion of Atlanta Journal-Constitution for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice
-
- White and Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
-
- 92-6852 LONG, KENNETH C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
-
-
-
- COMMON LAW CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 92-7619 IN RE ANDREW SEARCY
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
- 92-7904 IN RE W. J. GRAY
-
- 92-7937 IN RE KIRK E. GREGORY
-
- The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
-
- denied.
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 92-681 NOVOTNY, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1122 POLYAK, EARLENE V. CIR
-
- 92-5907 BETKA, ROLF V. SHALALA, SEC. H&HS, ET AL.
-
- 92-6591 SEWELL, JERRY WAYNE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6844 DUVALL, JOSEPH L. V. DUVALL, MARYANN E., ET AL.
-
- 92-6898 NELSON, JAMES DAVIS V. TUSCALOOSA, ET AL.
-
- 92-6926 HERMAN, JOSEPH W. V. DEPT. OF TREASURY, ET AL.
-
- 92-7004 ESTUS, DAVID V. LYNN, MICHAEL R.
-
- 92-7053 BRYSON, NORMAN V. BESSINGER, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7087 NAMER, ROBERT V. FTC
-
- 92-7144 KELLEY, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. GONZALEZ, NICHOLAS J., ET AL.
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
-
-
-
- ORDER
-
- It is ordered that the call of the calendar, except
-
- for special assignments, be suspended for the Term upon
-
- the conclusion of the case listed for hearing on Monday,
-
- April 26, 1993.
-
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-